test: improve coverage of ModuleMap.js
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/15924 Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <vsemozhetbyt@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f05a2d88d6
commit
3b90bd006f
44
test/parallel/test-internal-module-map-asserts.js
Normal file
44
test/parallel/test-internal-module-map-asserts.js
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
|
||||
// Flags: --expose-internals
|
||||
'use strict';
|
||||
|
||||
const common = require('../common');
|
||||
const assert = require('assert');
|
||||
const ModuleMap = require('internal/loader/ModuleMap');
|
||||
|
||||
// ModuleMap.get, ModuleMap.has and ModuleMap.set should only accept string
|
||||
// values as url argument.
|
||||
{
|
||||
const errorReg = common.expectsError({
|
||||
code: 'ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE',
|
||||
type: TypeError,
|
||||
message: /^The "url" argument must be of type string/
|
||||
}, 15);
|
||||
|
||||
const moduleMap = new ModuleMap();
|
||||
|
||||
// As long as the assertion of "job" argument is done after the assertion of
|
||||
// "url" argument this test suite is ok. Tried to mock the "job" parameter,
|
||||
// but I think it's useless, and was not simple to mock...
|
||||
const job = undefined;
|
||||
|
||||
[{}, [], true, 1, () => {}].forEach((value) => {
|
||||
assert.throws(() => moduleMap.get(value), errorReg);
|
||||
assert.throws(() => moduleMap.has(value), errorReg);
|
||||
assert.throws(() => moduleMap.set(value, job), errorReg);
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ModuleMap.set, job argument should only accept ModuleJob values.
|
||||
{
|
||||
const errorReg = common.expectsError({
|
||||
code: 'ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE',
|
||||
type: TypeError,
|
||||
message: /^The "job" argument must be of type ModuleJob/
|
||||
}, 5);
|
||||
|
||||
const moduleMap = new ModuleMap();
|
||||
|
||||
[{}, [], true, 1, () => {}].forEach((value) => {
|
||||
assert.throws(() => moduleMap.set('', value), errorReg);
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user