Put in some more safeguards against executing a division-by-zero.

Add dummy returns before every potential division-by-zero in int8.c,
because apparently further "improvements" in gcc's optimizer have
enabled it to break functions that weren't broken before.

Aurelien Jarno, via Martin Pitt
This commit is contained in:
Tom Lane 2011-03-11 18:19:03 -05:00
parent 994940f2fb
commit 0e68e1087c

View File

@ -599,9 +599,13 @@ int8div(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
int64 result;
if (arg2 == 0)
{
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_DIVISION_BY_ZERO),
errmsg("division by zero")));
/* ensure compiler realizes we mustn't reach the division (gcc bug) */
PG_RETURN_NULL();
}
result = arg1 / arg2;
@ -646,9 +650,14 @@ int8mod(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
int64 arg2 = PG_GETARG_INT64(1);
if (arg2 == 0)
{
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_DIVISION_BY_ZERO),
errmsg("division by zero")));
/* ensure compiler realizes we mustn't reach the division (gcc bug) */
PG_RETURN_NULL();
}
/* No overflow is possible */
PG_RETURN_INT64(arg1 % arg2);
@ -824,9 +833,13 @@ int84div(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
int64 result;
if (arg2 == 0)
{
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_DIVISION_BY_ZERO),
errmsg("division by zero")));
/* ensure compiler realizes we mustn't reach the division (gcc bug) */
PG_RETURN_NULL();
}
result = arg1 / arg2;
@ -1008,9 +1021,13 @@ int82div(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
int64 result;
if (arg2 == 0)
{
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_DIVISION_BY_ZERO),
errmsg("division by zero")));
/* ensure compiler realizes we mustn't reach the division (gcc bug) */
PG_RETURN_NULL();
}
result = arg1 / arg2;