Run perltidy over Catalog.pm
Commit 69eb643b2 deliberately left indentation unchanged to make the changes more legible. Rather than waiting until next year's perltidy run, do it now to avoid confusion Per suggestion from Álvaro Herrera Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20220907083558.vfvb5hcauaictgum%40alvherre.pgsql
This commit is contained in:
parent
69eb643b25
commit
b2e6e76823
@ -315,7 +315,8 @@ sub ParseData
|
||||
# We're treating the input line as a piece of Perl, so we
|
||||
# need to use string eval here. Tell perlcritic we know what
|
||||
# we're doing.
|
||||
eval '$hash_ref = ' . $_; ## no critic (ProhibitStringyEval)
|
||||
eval '$hash_ref = '
|
||||
. $_; ## no critic (ProhibitStringyEval)
|
||||
if (!ref $hash_ref)
|
||||
{
|
||||
die "$input_file: error parsing line $.:\n$_\n";
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user