Backpatch my fix of rev 1.48 to avoid a division-by-zero error in the
cost-limit vacuum code. Per trouble report from Joshua Drake.
This commit is contained in:
parent
78f53d5a00
commit
d3c7bd63b7
@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
|
||||
*
|
||||
*
|
||||
* IDENTIFICATION
|
||||
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/postmaster/autovacuum.c,v 1.5.2.7 2007/01/14 20:18:30 alvherre Exp $
|
||||
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/postmaster/autovacuum.c,v 1.5.2.8 2008/01/17 23:47:07 alvherre Exp $
|
||||
*
|
||||
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@ -814,6 +814,10 @@ test_rel_for_autovac(Oid relid, PgStat_StatTabEntry *tabentry,
|
||||
* If there is a tuple in pg_autovacuum, use it; else, use the GUC
|
||||
* defaults. Note that the fields may contain "-1" (or indeed any
|
||||
* negative value), which means use the GUC defaults for each setting.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Note: in cost_limit, 0 also means use the value from elsewhere, because
|
||||
* 0 is not a valid value for VacuumCostLimit.
|
||||
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (avForm != NULL)
|
||||
{
|
||||
@ -827,9 +831,9 @@ test_rel_for_autovac(Oid relid, PgStat_StatTabEntry *tabentry,
|
||||
anl_base_thresh = (avForm->anl_base_thresh >= 0) ?
|
||||
avForm->anl_base_thresh : autovacuum_anl_thresh;
|
||||
|
||||
vac_cost_limit = (avForm->vac_cost_limit >= 0) ?
|
||||
vac_cost_limit = (avForm->vac_cost_limit > 0) ?
|
||||
avForm->vac_cost_limit :
|
||||
((autovacuum_vac_cost_limit >= 0) ?
|
||||
((autovacuum_vac_cost_limit > 0) ?
|
||||
autovacuum_vac_cost_limit : VacuumCostLimit);
|
||||
|
||||
vac_cost_delay = (avForm->vac_cost_delay >= 0) ?
|
||||
@ -845,7 +849,7 @@ test_rel_for_autovac(Oid relid, PgStat_StatTabEntry *tabentry,
|
||||
anl_scale_factor = autovacuum_anl_scale;
|
||||
anl_base_thresh = autovacuum_anl_thresh;
|
||||
|
||||
vac_cost_limit = (autovacuum_vac_cost_limit >= 0) ?
|
||||
vac_cost_limit = (autovacuum_vac_cost_limit > 0) ?
|
||||
autovacuum_vac_cost_limit : VacuumCostLimit;
|
||||
|
||||
vac_cost_delay = (autovacuum_vac_cost_delay >= 0) ?
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user