Backpatch my fix of rev 1.48 to avoid a division-by-zero error in the

cost-limit vacuum code.  Per trouble report from Joshua Drake.
This commit is contained in:
Alvaro Herrera 2008-01-17 23:47:07 +00:00
parent 78f53d5a00
commit d3c7bd63b7

View File

@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
*
*
* IDENTIFICATION
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/postmaster/autovacuum.c,v 1.5.2.7 2007/01/14 20:18:30 alvherre Exp $
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/postmaster/autovacuum.c,v 1.5.2.8 2008/01/17 23:47:07 alvherre Exp $
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
@ -814,6 +814,10 @@ test_rel_for_autovac(Oid relid, PgStat_StatTabEntry *tabentry,
* If there is a tuple in pg_autovacuum, use it; else, use the GUC
* defaults. Note that the fields may contain "-1" (or indeed any
* negative value), which means use the GUC defaults for each setting.
*
* Note: in cost_limit, 0 also means use the value from elsewhere, because
* 0 is not a valid value for VacuumCostLimit.
*/
if (avForm != NULL)
{
@ -827,9 +831,9 @@ test_rel_for_autovac(Oid relid, PgStat_StatTabEntry *tabentry,
anl_base_thresh = (avForm->anl_base_thresh >= 0) ?
avForm->anl_base_thresh : autovacuum_anl_thresh;
vac_cost_limit = (avForm->vac_cost_limit >= 0) ?
vac_cost_limit = (avForm->vac_cost_limit > 0) ?
avForm->vac_cost_limit :
((autovacuum_vac_cost_limit >= 0) ?
((autovacuum_vac_cost_limit > 0) ?
autovacuum_vac_cost_limit : VacuumCostLimit);
vac_cost_delay = (avForm->vac_cost_delay >= 0) ?
@ -845,7 +849,7 @@ test_rel_for_autovac(Oid relid, PgStat_StatTabEntry *tabentry,
anl_scale_factor = autovacuum_anl_scale;
anl_base_thresh = autovacuum_anl_thresh;
vac_cost_limit = (autovacuum_vac_cost_limit >= 0) ?
vac_cost_limit = (autovacuum_vac_cost_limit > 0) ?
autovacuum_vac_cost_limit : VacuumCostLimit;
vac_cost_delay = (autovacuum_vac_cost_delay >= 0) ?