spinlock emulation: Fix bug when more than INT_MAX spinlocks are initialized.
Once the counter goes negative we ended up with spinlocks that errored out on first use (due to check in tas_sema). Author: Andres Freund Reviewed-By: Robert Haas Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200606023103.avzrctgv7476xj7i@alap3.anarazel.de Backpatch: 9.5-
This commit is contained in:
parent
4f01103d64
commit
dcf3cb60cb
@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ SpinlockSemaInit(PGSemaphore spinsemas)
|
||||
void
|
||||
s_init_lock_sema(volatile slock_t *lock, bool nested)
|
||||
{
|
||||
static int counter = 0;
|
||||
static uint32 counter = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
*lock = (++counter) % NUM_SPINLOCK_SEMAPHORES;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user