Re-Align *_freeze_max_age reloption limits with corresponding GUC limits.
In 020235a5754 I lowered the autovacuum_*freeze_max_age minimums to allow for easier testing of wraparounds. I did not touch the corresponding per-table limits. While those don't matter for the purpose of wraparound, it seems more consistent to lower them as well. It's noteworthy that the previous reloption lower limit for autovacuum_multixact_freeze_max_age was too high by one magnitude, even before 020235a5754. Discussion: 26377.1443105453@sss.pgh.pa.us Backpatch: back to 9.0 (in parts), like the prior patch
This commit is contained in:
parent
3d8987fc21
commit
eeb0b78302
@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ static relopt_int intRelOpts[] =
|
|||||||
"Age at which to autovacuum a table to prevent transaction ID wraparound",
|
"Age at which to autovacuum a table to prevent transaction ID wraparound",
|
||||||
RELOPT_KIND_HEAP | RELOPT_KIND_TOAST
|
RELOPT_KIND_HEAP | RELOPT_KIND_TOAST
|
||||||
},
|
},
|
||||||
-1, 100000000, 2000000000
|
-1, 100000, 2000000000
|
||||||
},
|
},
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user