The # of bytes processed was accumulated slightly incorrectly. After
loading more data to the input buffer, we added the number of bytes in
the buffer to the sum. But in case of multi-byte characters or escapes,
there can be a few unprocessed bytes left over from previous load in the
buffer. Those bytes got counted twice.
I'm having a hard time telling whether the letter of the C standard
requires this, but we do have a couple of buildfarm members that
throw warnings when this is not done. Oversight in c532d15dd.
Copy.c has grown really large. Split it into more manageable parts:
- copy.c now contains only a few functions that are common to COPY FROM
and COPY TO.
- copyto.c contains code for COPY TO.
- copyfrom.c contains code for initializing COPY FROM, and inserting the
tuples to the correct table.
- copyfromparse.c contains code for reading from the client/file/program,
and parsing the input text/CSV/binary format into tuples.
All of these parts are fairly complicated, and fairly independent of each
other. There is a patch being discussed to implement parallel COPY FROM,
which will add a lot of new code to the COPY FROM path, and another patch
which would allow INSERTs to use the same multi-insert machinery as COPY
FROM, both of which will require refactoring that code. With those two
patches, there's going to be a lot of code churn in copy.c anyway, so now
seems like a good time to do this refactoring.
The CopyStateData struct is also split. All the formatting options, like
FORMAT, QUOTE, ESCAPE, are put in a new CopyFormatOption struct, which
is used by both COPY FROM and TO. Other state data are kept in separate
CopyFromStateData and CopyToStateData structs.
Reviewed-by: Soumyadeep Chakraborty, Erik Rijkers, Vignesh C, Andres Freund
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/8e15b560-f387-7acc-ac90-763986617bfb%40iki.fi
