A few recent JSON aggregates have been added without much consideration
to the existing order. Put these back in alphabetical order (with the
exception of the JSONB variant of each JSON aggregate).
Author: Wolfgang Walther <walther@technowledgy.de>
Reviewed-by: Marlene Reiterer <marlene.reiterer.03@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/6a7b910c-3feb-4006-b817-9b4759cb6bb6%40technowledgy.de
Backpatch-through: 16, where these aggregates were added
check_agglevels_and_constraints() asserted that if we find an
aggregate function in an EXPR_KIND_FROM_SUBSELECT expression, the
expression must be in a LATERAL subquery. Alexander Lakhin found a
case where that's not so: because of the odd scoping rules for NEW/OLD
within a rule, a reference to NEW/OLD could cause an aggregate to be
considered top-level even though it's in an unmarked sub-select.
The error message that would be thrown seems sufficiently on-point,
so just remove the Assert. (Hence, this is not a bug for production
builds.)
This Assert was added by me in commit eaccfded9 (9.3 era). It looks
like I put it in to cross-check that the new logic for detecting
misplaced aggregates (using agglevelsup) caught the same cases that a
previous check on p_lateral_active did. So there might have been some
related misbehavior before eaccfded9 ... but that's very ancient
history by now, so I didn't dig any deeper.
Per bug #18608 from Alexander Lakhin. Back-patch to all supported
branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18608-48de0717508ee429@postgresql.org
When building a JSON object, the code builds a hash table of keys, to
allow checking if the keys are unique. The uniqueness check and adding
the new key happens in json_unique_check_key(), but this assumes the
pointer to the key remains valid.
Unfortunately, two places passed pointers to keys in a buffer, while
also appending more data (additional key/value pairs) to the buffer.
With enough data the buffer is resized by enlargeStringInfo(), which
calls repalloc(), invalidating the earlier key pointers.
Due to this the uniqueness check may fail with both false negatives and
false positives, producing JSON objects with duplicate keys or failing
to produce a perfectly valid JSON object.
This affects multiple functions that enforce uniqueness of keys, all
introduced in PG16 with the new SQL/JSON:
- json_object_agg_unique / jsonb_object_agg_unique
- json_object / jsonb_objectagg
Existing regression tests did not detect the issue, simply because the
initial buffer size is 1024 and the objects were small enough not to
require the repalloc.
With a sufficiently large object, AddressSanitizer reported the access
to invalid memory immediately. So would valgrind, of course.
Fixed by copying the key into the hash table memory context, and adding
regression tests with enough data to repalloc the buffer. Backpatch to
16, where the functions were introduced.
Reported by Alexander Lakhin. Investigation and initial fix by Junwang
Zhao, with various improvements and tests by me.
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin
Author: Junwang Zhao, Tomas Vondra
Backpatch-through: 16
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18598-3279ed972a2347c7@postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEG8a3JjH0ReJF2_O7-8LuEbO69BxPhYeXs95_x7+H9AMWF1gw@mail.gmail.com
We must drop whitespace while parsing the input, else libxml2
will include "blank" nodes that interfere with the desired
indentation behavior. The end result is that we didn't indent
nodes separated by whitespace.
Also, it seems that libxml2 may add a trailing newline when working
in DOCUMENT mode. This is semantically insignificant, so strip it.
This is in the gray area between being a bug fix and a definition
change. However, the INDENT option is still pretty new (since v16),
so I think we can get away with changing this in stable branches.
Hence, back-patch to v16.
Jim Jones
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/872865a8-548b-48e1-bfcd-4e38e672c1e4@uni-muenster.de
As introduced by f9900df5f94, a REINDEX CONCURRENTLY job done for an
index with predicates or expressions would set PROC_IN_SAFE_IC in its
MyProc->statusFlags, causing it to be ignored by other concurrent
operations.
Such concurrent index rebuilds should never be ignored, as a predicate
or an expression could call a user-defined function that accesses a
different table than the table where the index is rebuilt.
A test that uses injection points is added, backpatched down to 17.
Michail has proposed a different test, but I have added something
simpler with more coverage.
Oversight in f9900df5f949.
Author: Michail Nikolaev
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CANtu0oj9A3kZVduFTG0vrmGnKB+DCHgEpzOp0qAyOgmks84j0w@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 14
pg_stat_get_io() applied TimestampTzGetDatum twice to the
stat_reset_timestamp value. On 64-bit builds that's harmless because
TimestampTzGetDatum is a no-op, but on 32-bit builds it results in
displaying garbage in the stats_reset column of the pg_stat_io view.
Bug dates to commit a9c70b46d which introduced pg_stat_io, so
back-patch to v16 where that came in.
Bertrand Drouvot
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/Ztrd+XcPTz1zorkg@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal
Since commit 2549f0661, we reject an identifier immediately following
a numeric literal (without separating whitespace), because that risks
ambiguity with hex/octal/binary integers. However, that patch used
token patterns like "{integer}{ident_start}", which is problematic
because {ident_start} matches only a single byte. If the first
character after the integer is a multibyte character, this ends up
with flex reporting an error message that includes a partial multibyte
character. That can cause assorted bad-encoding problems downstream,
both in the report to the client and in the postmaster log file.
To fix, use {identifier} not {ident_start} in the "junk" token
patterns, so that they will match complete multibyte characters.
This seems generally better user experience quite aside from the
encoding problem: for "123abc" the error message will now say that
the error appeared at or near "123abc" instead of "123a".
While at it, add some commentary about why these patterns exist
and how they work.
Report and patch by Karina Litskevich; review by Pavel Borisov.
Back-patch to v15 where the problem came in.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACiT8iZ_diop=0zJ7zuY3BXegJpkKK1Av-PU7xh0EDYHsa5+=g@mail.gmail.com
The first test was sensitive to the insert LSN after setting up the
catalogs, which depended on environmental things like the locales on the
OS and usernames. Switch to a new WAL file before the first test, as a
simple way to put every computer into the same state.
Back-patch to all supported releases.
Reported-by: Anton Voloshin <a.voloshin@postgrespro.ru>
Reported-by: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b26aeac2-cb6d-4633-a7ea-945baae83dcf%40postgrespro.ru
This change improves the description of the
restrict_nonsystem_relation_kind parameter in guc_table.c and the
documentation for better clarity.
Backpatch to 12, where this GUC parameter was introduced.
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/6a96f1af-22b4-4a80-8161-1f26606b9ee2%40eisentraut.org
Backpatch-through: 12
Commit 2489d76c4 removed some logic from pullup_replace_vars()
that avoided wrapping a PlaceHolderVar around a pulled-up
subquery output expression if the expression could be proven
to go to NULL anyway (because it contained Vars or PHVs of the
pulled-up relation and did not contain non-strict constructs).
But removing that logic turns out to cause performance regressions
in some cases, because the extra PHV blocks subexpression folding,
and will do so even if outer-join reduction later turns it into a
no-op with no phnullingrels bits. This can for example prevent
an expression from being matched to an index.
The reason for always adding a PHV was to ensure we had someplace
to put the varnullingrels marker bits of the Var being replaced.
However, it turns out we can optimize in exactly the same cases that
the previous code did, because we can instead attach the needed
varnullingrels bits to the contained Var(s)/PHV(s).
This is not a complete solution --- it would be even better if we
could remove PHVs after reducing them to no-ops. It doesn't look
practical to back-patch such an improvement, but this change seems
safe and at least gets rid of the performance-regression cases.
Per complaint from Nikhil Raj. Back-patch to v16 where the
problem appeared.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAG1ps1xvnTZceKK24OUfMKLPvDP2vjT-d+F2AOCWbw_v3KeEgg@mail.gmail.com
If an ORDER BY item in SELECT is a bare identifier, the parser
first seeks it as an output column name of the SELECT (for SQL92
compatibility). However, ruleutils.c is expecting the SQL99
interpretation where such a name is an input column name. So it's
possible to produce an incorrect display of a view in the (admittedly
pretty ill-advised) case where some other column is renamed in the
SELECT output list to match an ORDER BY column.
This can be fixed by table-qualifying such names in the dumped
view text. To avoid cluttering less-ill-advised queries, we'd
like to do so only when there's an actual name conflict.
That requires passing the current get_query_def call's resultDesc
parameter down to get_variable, so that it can determine what
the output column names are. In hopes of reducing rather than
increasing notational clutter in ruleutils.c, I moved that value
into the deparse_context struct and removed it from the parameter
lists of get_query_def's other subroutines.
I made a few other cosmetic changes while at it:
* Likewise move the colNamesVisible parameter into deparse_context.
* Rename deparse_context's windowTList field to targetList,
since it's no longer used only in connection with WINDOW clauses.
* Replace the special_exprkind field with a bool inGroupBy,
since that was all it was being used for, and the apparent
flexibility of storing a ParseExprKind proved to be illusory.
(We need a separate varInOrderBy field to make this patch work.)
* Remove useless save/restore logic in get_select_query_def.
In principle, this bug is quite old. However, it seems unreachable
before 1b4d280ea, because before that the presence of "new" and "old"
entries in a view's rangetable caused us to always table-qualify every
Var reference in dumped views. Hence, back-patch to v16 where that
came in.
Per bug #18589 from Quynh Tran.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18589-70091cb81db1a3f1@postgresql.org
This does not make sense. It would write the output of the USING
clause into the converted column, which would violate the generation
expression. This adds a check to error out if this is specified.
There was a test for this, but that test errored out for a different
reason, so it was not effective.
Reported-by: Jian He <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Yugo NAGATA <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/c7083982-69f4-4b14-8315-f9ddb20b9834%40eisentraut.org
We advance origin progress during abort on successful streaming and
application of ROLLBACK in parallel streaming mode. But the origin
shouldn't be advanced during an error or unsuccessful apply due to
shutdown. Otherwise, it will result in a transaction loss as such a
transaction won't be sent again by the server.
Reported-by: Hou Zhijie
Author: Hayato Kuroda and Shveta Malik
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 16
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/TYAPR01MB5692FAC23BE40C69DA8ED4AFF5B92@TYAPR01MB5692.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
The descriptions for ProcArrayGroupUpdate and XactGroupUpdate claim
that these events mean we are waiting for the group leader "at end
of a parallel operation," but neither pertains to parallel
operations. This commit reverts these descriptions to their
wording before commit 3048898e73, i.e., "end of a parallel
operation" is changed to "transaction end."
Author: Sameer Kumar
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGPeHmh6UMrKQHKCmX%2B5vV5TH9P%3DKw9en3k68qEem6J%3DyrZPUA%40mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
When a partition is detached and immediately dropped, a prepared
statement could try to compute a new partition descriptor that includes
it. This leads to this kind of error:
ERROR: could not open relation with OID 457639
Avoid this by skipping the partition in expand_partitioned_rtentry if it
doesn't exist.
Noted by me while investigating bug #18559. Kuntal Gosh helped to
identify the exact failure.
Backpatch to 14, where DETACH CONCURRENTLY was introduced.
Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Reviewed-by: Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2007@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202408122233.bo4adt3vh5bi@alvherre.pgsql
Add a comment explaining dropdb() can't rely on syscache. The issue with
flattened rows was fixed by commit 0f92b230f88b, but better to have
a clear explanation why the systable scan is necessary. The other places
doing in-place updates on pg_database have the same comment.
Suggestion and patch by Yugo Nagata. Backpatch to 12, same as the fix.
Author: Yugo Nagata
Backpatch-through: 12
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJTYsWWNkCt+-UnMhg=BiCD3Mh8c2JdHLofPxsW3m2dkDFw8RA@mail.gmail.com
Commit 274bbced disabled session tickets for TLSv1.3 on top of the
already disabled TLSv1.2 session tickets, but accidentally caused
a regression where TLSv1.2 session tickets were incorrectly sent.
Fix by unconditionally disabling TLSv1.2 session tickets and only
disable TLSv1.3 tickets when the right version of OpenSSL is used.
Backpatch to all supported branches.
Reported-by: Cameron Vogt <cvogt@automaticcontrols.net>
Reported-by: Fire Emerald <fire.github@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/DM6PR16MB3145CF62857226F350C710D1AB852@DM6PR16MB3145.namprd16.prod.outlook.com
Backpatch-through: v12
Commit ca051d8b101 called newlocale(LC_COLLATE, ...) instead of
newlocale(LC_COLLATE_MASK, ...), in code reached only on FreeBSD. They
have the same value on that OS, explaining why it worked. Fix.
Back-patch to 14, where ca051d8b101 landed.
MacPorts version 2.9.3 started failing in our ci_macports_packages.sh
script, for reasons not fully determined, but plausibly linked to the
release of 2.10.1. 2.10.1 seems to work, so let's switch to it.
Back-patch to 15, where CI began.
Reported-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/81f104e8-f0a9-43c0-85bd-2bbbf590a5b8%40eisentraut.org
Commit c66a7d75e652 modified DROP DATABASE so that if interrupted, the
database is known to be in an invalid state and can only be dropped.
This is done by setting a flag using an in-place update, so that it's
not lost in case of rollback.
For databases with many ACLs, this may however fail like this:
ERROR: wrong tuple length
This happens because with many ACLs, the pg_database.datacl attribute
gets TOASTed. The dropdb() code reads the tuple from the syscache, which
means it's detoasted. But the in-place update expects the tuple length
to match the on-disk tuple.
Fixed by reading the tuple from the catalog directly, not from syscache.
Report and fix by Ayush Tiwari. Backpatch to 12. The DROP DATABASE fix
was backpatched to 11, but 11 is EOL at this point.
Reported-by: Ayush Tiwari
Author: Ayush Tiwari
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra
Backpatch-through: 12
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJTYsWWNkCt+-UnMhg=BiCD3Mh8c2JdHLofPxsW3m2dkDFw8RA@mail.gmail.com
If a partition undergoes DETACH CONCURRENTLY immediately followed by
DROP, this could cause a problem for a concurrent transaction
recomputing the partition descriptor when running a prepared statement,
because it tries to dereference a pointer to a tuple that's not found in
a catalog scan.
The existing retry logic added in commit dbca3469ebf8 is sufficient to
cope with the overall problem, provided we don't try to dereference a
non-existant heap tuple.
Arguably, the code in RelationBuildPartitionDesc() has been wrong all
along, since no check was added in commit 898e5e3290a7 against receiving
a NULL tuple from the catalog scan; that bug has only become
user-visible with DETACH CONCURRENTLY which was added in branch 14.
Therefore, even though there's no known mechanism to cause a crash
because of this, backpatch the addition of such a check to all supported
branches. In branches prior to 14, this would cause the code to fail
with a "missing relpartbound for relation XYZ" error instead of
crashing; that's okay, because there are no reports of such behavior
anyway.
Author: Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2007@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18559-b48286d2eacd9a4e@postgresql.org
Coverity thinks dpns->plan could be null at these points. That
shouldn't really be possible, but it's easy enough to modify the
Asserts so they'd not core-dump if it were true.
These are new in b919a97a6. Back-patch to v13; the v12 version
of the patch didn't have these Asserts.
The code intends to allow GUCs to be set within parallel workers
via function SET clauses, but not otherwise. However, doing so fails
for "session_authorization" and "role", because the assign hooks for
those attempt to set the subsidiary "is_superuser" GUC, and that call
falls foul of the "not otherwise" prohibition. We can't switch to
using GUC_ACTION_SAVE for this, so instead add a new GUC variable
flag GUC_ALLOW_IN_PARALLEL to mark is_superuser as being safe to set
anyway. (This is okay because is_superuser has context PGC_INTERNAL
and thus only hard-wired calls can change it. We'd need more thought
before applying the flag to other GUCs; but maybe there are other
use-cases.) This isn't the prettiest fix perhaps, but other
alternatives we thought of would be much more invasive.
While here, correct a thinko in commit 059de3ca4: when rejecting
a GUC setting within a parallel worker, we should return 0 not -1
if the ereport doesn't longjmp. (This seems to have no consequences
right now because no caller cares, but it's inconsistent.) Improve
the comments to try to forestall future confusion of the same kind.
Despite the lack of field complaints, this seems worth back-patching.
Thanks to Nathan Bossart for the idea to invent a new flag,
and for review.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2833457.1723229039@sss.pgh.pa.us
This section claims we use CRC-32 for WAL records and two-phase
state files, but we've actually used CRC-32C since v9.5 (commit
5028f22f6e). Fix that.
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZrUFpLP-w2zTAHqq%40nathan
Backpatch-through: 12
To deparse a reference to a field of a RECORD-type output of a
subquery, EXPLAIN normally digs down into the subquery's plan to try
to discover exactly which anonymous RECORD type is meant. However,
this can fail if the subquery has been optimized out of the plan
altogether on the grounds that no rows could pass the WHERE quals,
which has been possible at least since 3fc6e2d7f. There isn't
anything remaining in the plan tree that would help us, so fall back
to printing the field name as "fN" for the N'th column of the record.
(This will actually be the right thing some of the time, since it
matches the column names we assign to RowExprs.)
In passing, fix a comment typo in create_projection_plan, which
I noticed while experimenting with an alternative fix for this.
Per bug #18576 from Vasya B. Back-patch to all supported branches.
Richard Guo and Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18576-9feac34e132fea9e@postgresql.org
Trying to attach a table as a partition which is already on the
referenced side of a foreign key on the partitioned table that it is
being attached to, leads to strange behavior: we try to clone the
foreign key from the parent to the partition, but this new FK points to
the partition itself, and the mix of pg_constraint rows and triggers
doesn't behave well.
Rather than trying to untangle the mess (which might be possible given
sufficient time), I opted to forbid the ATTACH. This doesn't seem a
problematic restriction, given that we already fail to create the
foreign key if you do it the other way around, that is, having the
partition first and the FK second.
Backpatch to all supported branches.
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18541-628a61bc267cd2d3@postgresql.org
getTimelineHistory() is called twice, to read the source and the
target timeline history files. However, the loop to print the file
with the --debug option used the wrong variable when dealing with the
source. As a result, the source's history was always printed as empty.
Spotted while debugging bug #18575, but this does not fix that bug,
just the debugging output. Backpatch to all supported versions.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/092dd515-b7b4-4fd0-8407-ceca2f02f6ec@iki.fi
Commit 0b9466fce added a dependency on fe_memutils' pnstrdup() inside
informix.c. This adds an exit() path in a library, which we don't
want. (Unlike libpq, the ecpg libraries don't have an automated check
for that, but it makes sense to keep them to a similar standard.) The
ecpg code can already handle failure results from the *strdup() call
by itself.
Author: Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAOYmi+=pg=W5L1h=3MEP_EB24jaBu2FyATrLXqQHGe7cpuvwyg@mail.gmail.com
If the plancache entry for the CALL statement is already stale,
it's possible for us to fetch an old procedure OID out of it,
and then fail with "cache lookup failed for function NNN".
In ordinary usage this never happens because make_callstmt_target
is called just once immediately after building the plancache
entry. It can be forced however by setting up an erroneous CALL
(that causes make_callstmt_target itself to report an error),
then dropping/recreating the target procedure, then repeating
the erroneous CALL.
To fix, use SPI_plan_get_cached_plan() to fetch the plancache's
plan, rather than assuming we can use SPI_plan_get_plan_sources().
This shouldn't add any noticeable overhead in the normal case,
and in the stale-plan case we'd have had to replan anyway a little
further down.
The other callers of SPI_plan_get_plan_sources() seem OK, because
either they don't need up-to-date plans or they know that the
query was just (re) planned. But add some commentary in hopes
of not falling into this trap again.
Per bug #18574 from Song Hongyu. Back-patch to v14 where this coding
was introduced. (Older branches have comparable code, but it's run
after any required replanning, so there's no issue.)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18574-2ce7ba3249221389@postgresql.org
Replace a static scratch buffer with a local variable, because a
static buffer makes the function not thread-safe. This function is
used in client-code in libpq, so it needs to be thread-safe. It was
until commit b67b57a966, which replaced the implementation with the
one from pgcrypto.
Backpatch to v14, where we switched to the new implementation.
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/dfa2015d-ad21-4802-a4cc-3850fc5fff3f@iki.fi
When pg_dump retrieves the list of database objects and performs the
data dump, there was possibility that objects are replaced with others
of the same name, such as views, and access them. This vulnerability
could result in code execution with superuser privileges during the
pg_dump process.
This issue can arise when dumping data of sequences, foreign
tables (only 13 or later), or tables registered with a WHERE clause in
the extension configuration table.
To address this, pg_dump now utilizes the newly introduced
restrict_nonsystem_relation_kind GUC parameter to restrict the
accesses to non-system views and foreign tables during the dump
process. This new GUC parameter is added to back branches too, but
these changes do not require cluster recreation.
Back-patch to all supported branches.
Reviewed-by: Noah Misch
Security: CVE-2024-7348
Backpatch-through: 12
Back-patch of commit cff4e5a3 to 15 and 16, per request from Oleg
Tselebrovskiy. Original commit message:
On other Windows build farm animals it is already skipped because they
don't use UTF-8 encoding. On "hamerkop", UTF-8 is used, and then the
test fails.
It is not clear to me (a non-Windows person looking only at buildfarm
evidence) whether Windows is less sophisticated than other OSes and
doesn't know how to downcase Turkish İ with the standard Unicode
database, or if it is more sophisticated than other systems and uses
locale-specific behavior like ICU does.
Whichever the reason, the result is the same: we need to skip the test
on Windows, just as we already do for ICU, at least until a
Windows-savvy developer comes up with a better idea. The technique for
detecting the OS is borrowed from collate.windows.win1252.sql.
This was anticipated by commit c2e8bd27, but the problem only surfaced
when Windows build farm animals started using Meson.
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGJ1LeC3aE2qQYTK95rFVON3ZVoTQpTKJqxkHdtEyawH4A%40mail.gmail.com
This reverts commit 849326e49a5dd56941eb8fb4699130c301bff303.
Some buildfarm animals are failing with "cannot change
"client_encoding" during a parallel operation". It looks like
assign_client_encoding is unhappy at being asked to roll back a
client_encoding setting after a parallel worker encounters a
failure. There must be more to it though: why didn't I see this
during local testing? In any case, it's clear that moving the
RestoreGUCState() call is not as side-effect-free as I thought.
Given that the bug f5f30c22e intended to fix has gone unreported
for years, it's not something that's urgent to fix; I'm not
willing to risk messing with it further with only days to our
next release wrap.
Parallel workers failed after a sequence like
BEGIN;
CREATE USER foo;
SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION foo;
because check_session_authorization could not see the uncommitted
pg_authid row for "foo". This is because we ran RestoreGUCState()
in a separate transaction using an ordinary just-created snapshot.
The same disease afflicts any other GUC that requires catalog lookups
and isn't forgiving about the lookups failing.
To fix, postpone RestoreGUCState() into the worker's main transaction
after we've set up a snapshot duplicating the leader's. This affects
check_transaction_isolation and check_transaction_deferrable, which
think they should only run during transaction start. Make them
act like check_transaction_read_only, which already knows it should
silently accept the value when InitializingParallelWorker.
Per bug #18545 from Andrey Rachitskiy. Back-patch to all
supported branches, because this has been wrong for awhile.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18545-feba138862f19aaa@postgresql.org
Prior to this commit, the docs for enable_partitionwise_aggregate and
enable_partitionwise_join mentioned the additional overheads enabling
these causes for the query planner, but they mentioned nothing about the
possible surge in work_mem-consuming executor nodes that could end up in
the final plan. Dimitrios reported the OOM killer intervened on his
query as a result of using enable_partitionwise_aggregate=on.
Here we adjust the docs to mention the possible increase in the number of
work_mem-consuming executor nodes that can appear in the final plan as a
result of enabling these GUCs.
Reported-by: Dimitrios Apostolou
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3603c380-d094-136e-e333-610914fb3e80%40gmx.net
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvoZ0_yqwPFEpb6h261L76BUpmh5GxBQq0LeRzQ5Jh3zzg@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 12, oldest supported version
01e2b7f0fd02a44e introduced a test that vacuum correctly removes tuples
older than OldestXmin. The same commit was backpatched on 14-16, but 16
is the only version with meson and the test was mistakenly left off of
the recovery test meson build file. Add it now.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAKRu_bWmMjmqL%2BOZ2duEQ80u7cRvpsExLNZNjzk-pXX5skwMQ%40mail.gmail.com
01e2b7f0fd02a44e introduced a test which generated dead tuples for
vacuum with an UPDATE. The test only required enough dead TIDs for two
rounds of index vacuuming. This can be accomplished with a DELETE
instead of an UPDATE -- which generates about 50% less WAL and makes the
test 20% faster in many cases. The test takes several seconds (more on
slow buildfarm animals) because we need quite a few tuples to trigger
two rounds of index vacuuming; so it is worth a follow-on commit to
speed it up.
Suggested-by: Masahiko Sawada
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAKRu_bWmMjmqL%2BOZ2duEQ80u7cRvpsExLNZNjzk-pXX5skwMQ%40mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 14, the first version containing this test.
pg_size_pretty(bigint) would return the value in bytes rather than PB
for the smallest-most bigint value. This happened due to an incorrect
assumption that the absolute value of -9223372036854775808 could be
stored inside a signed 64-bit type.
Here we fix that by instead storing that value in an unsigned 64-bit type.
This bug does exist in versions prior to 15 but the code there is
sufficiently different and the bug seems sufficiently non-critical that
it does not seem worth risking backpatching further.
Author: Joseph Koshakow <koshy44@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAvxfHdTsMZPWEHUrZ=h3cky9Ccc3Mtx2whUHygY+ABP-mCmUw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 15
Commit 453c4687377 introduced a use of strerror() into libpq, but that
is not thread-safe. Fix by using strerror_r() instead.
In passing, update some of the code comments added by 453c4687377, as
we have learned more about the reason for the change in OpenSSL that
started this.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Discussion: Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b6fb018b-f05c-4afd-abd3-318c649faf18@highgo.ca
To build with -Dreadline=enabled one can use either readline or
libedit. The -Dlibedit_preferred flag is supposed to control the order
of names to lookup. This works fine when either both libraries are
present or -Dreadline is set to auto. However, explicitly enabling
readline with only libedit present, but not setting libedit_preferred,
or alternatively enabling readline with only readline present, but
setting libedit_preferred, too, are both broken. This is because
cc.find_library will throw an error for a not found dependency as soon
as the first required dependency is checked, thus it's impossible to
fallback to the alternative.
Here we only check the second of the two dependencies for
requiredness, thus we only fail when none of the two can be found.
Author: Wolfgang Walther
Reviewed-by: Nazir Bilal Yavuz, Alvaro Herrera, Peter Eisentraut
Reviewed-by: Tristan Partin
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ca8f37e1-a2c3-40e2-91f6-59c3d3652ad4@technowledgy.de
Backpatch: 16-, where meson support was added
